Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences (SJMS) | Sudan JMS: Volume 13 (2018), Issue No. 1 | pages: 22-32

, , , , , , , , and

1. Introduction

Hepatitis B (HB) is a serious chronic infection of the liver and caused by HB Virus (HBV). During the acute phase, the majority of HB patients are asymptomatic. However, the symptoms may last for several weeks in those who are symptomatic [1]. HBV can be transmitted through different mechanisms, including contact with blood and blood products, sexual intercourse, contaminated needles and haemodialysis [2].

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are defined as “all paid and unpaid persons working in health-care settings who have the potential for exposure to infectious materials (e.g. blood, tissue and specific body fluids, and medical supplies, equipment, or environmental surfaces contaminated with these substances)” [3].

The World Health Organization estimated that about 240 million patients are currently infected with HBV [1]. Worldwide, sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia are considered to have the highest prevalence of HB (5-10% chronically infected adult patients) [1]. The prevalence of HB surface antigen (HBsAg) in Sudan is more than 8% [5]. The prevalence of HBV among HCWs in not exactly known, but it was estimated to be similar to that of non- HCW [6]. Annually, more than 60,000 cases of HBV infection among HCWs are due to contaminated sharp injuries alone [7]. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of HB infection after the introduction of the HBV vaccines [8].

Worldwide, many studies have been conducted to assess the level of the knowledge, attitude, and practice of HCWs toward HBV, and others have evaluated the vaccination status of HCWs [9,10,11,14]. Previous studies conducted in Sudan have addressed these two issues; some were conducted in public hospitals outside the capital (Khartoum) and those conducted inside the capital were limited to few hospitals [9,10,11].

The purpose of this study was to assess the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of the Sudanese HCWs toward HBV and their vaccination status in multiple public hospitals in Khartoum state. This can help in exploring barriers for not getting HBV vaccination and creating effective strategies to limit the HBV infection in HCWs.

2. Methods

2.1. Study setting and participants

It was a cross-sectional analytical study among HCWs in 10 chosen public hospitals in Khartoum in the Sudan, from July to August 2015. These hospitals were: Soba University Hospital, Khartoum Teaching Hospital, Khartoum North Teaching Hospital, Omdurman Teaching Hospital, Military Hospital Helipad, Khartoum Dental Teaching Hospital, Radiation and Isotopes Center-Khartoum, AlShaab Specialized Teaching Hospital, Ibrahim Malik Teaching Hospital, E.N.T Specialized Hospital.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: HCWs who were working in the medical service across different departments and specialties during the time of the study (doctors, nurses, lab technicians, midwives and dentists); and those who agreed to participate in the study.

2.2. Sampling technique

We obtain the total number of HCWs and distribution in different specialties in Khartoum state from the ministry of health annual report. [12]. We could not employ random sampling because of the lack of an accurate list of names of all HCWs in the city's hospitals. We included 372 HCWs in our study out of a total population of 10331 HCWs [12,13].

2.3. Sample size calculation

The sample size was obtained using the following formula:

Sample size = N/(1+N(d)2

Where:

N= Population size = 10331

d = Level of precision = 0.05.

2.4. Study questionnaire

A self-administered was used, 39 items questionnaire composed of five sections. In addition to the socio-demographic and work-related characteristics, 25 questions evaluated knowledge towards HB, four questions assessed attitude, three questions explored practices towards HB, and five assessed the respondent's vaccination status. The questions were designed after performing a wide range literature review [14–20].

2.5. Statistical analysis

We used SPSS v20.0 for data entry and analysis. The study predictor variables were the socio-demographic data and the levels of knowledge, attitude and practice towards HB, while the outcome variable is the vaccination status of the respondents. We assigned one point for each correct answer and zero points for each incorrect one. The total number of points was 25, 4, and 3 points for knowledge, attitude and practice, respectively. The KAP score was the sum of the three categories, which is 32 points. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for chi-square test to assess the relationship between variables.

3. Results

The mean age of study participants was 30.01 years and the male to female ratio was 1:2. Most of the participants were doctors: 119 (32.0%). The socio-demographics of the 372 respondents are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of the study respondents.


Characteristics N Percentage
GENDER
Male 128 34.4
Female 242 65.1
Missing 2 0.5
OCCUPATION
Doctor 119 32.0
lab technician 35 9.4
Nurse 187 50.3
Midwife 12 3.2
Dentist 19 5.1
AGE GROUPS, YEARS
20-30 254 68.3
31-40 66 17.7
41-50 33 8.9
51-60 9 2.4
Missing 10 2.7
VACCINATION STATUS:
Vaccinated 270 72.6
Not vaccinated 102 27.4
TOTAL 372 100

3.1. Assessment of knowledge

Knowledge was assessed by questions focusing on HB causes, transmission, sign and symptoms, and management. The average respondents' knowledge score was 18.4 points. Regarding occupational distribution, all dentists scored above the average and 117 (98.3%) of doctors scored above the average. On the other hand, 20.0% of respondents thought that HB could be transmitted through contaminated food. In addition, only 9.9% of respondents scored high points on the knowledge assessment questions. More than 70.0% of the study respondents have a good level of knowledge, as assessed by the mode of transmission questions. Also, 213 (96.0%) of respondents knew the correct method of diagnosing HB.

3.2. Assessment of attitude

Attitude towards HB was assessed by four questions. This study showed that 81.5% of respondents did not know the guidelines that should be followed after a needle injury. In addition, 46% of respondents stated that HB patients should be quarantined, and 41.7%said that they will not share household items with a HB patient because it is not safe. Overall, the average respondents' attitude score was 2.14 points “of 4 points”.

3.3. Assessment of practice

The results showed that 17.5% of respondents avoid dealing with HB patients, and 12.6% of doctors do not wear gloves when they deal with the patients.

3.4. Vaccination status

This study revealed that 27.4% of respondents were not vaccinated against HB. In total, 71.3% did not obtain the post-vaccination test to ensure the efficiency of the vaccination. Hospitals were found to be the most frequent place where respondents had obtained their vaccination - 61.0% of the vaccinated respondents received their vaccination there. In total, 7.4% of the respondents were not vaccinated due to the financial deficit, while 37.2% did not know where they could find the vaccine.

3.5. Mean KAP score

The mean overall KAP score was found to be moderate (20-25 points, out of 32 points), with doctors scoring the highest KAP score compared with other occupations.

Association of descriptive characteristics and mean KAP scores

The study revealed that there is a positive significant association between the age of participants and their mean KAP score (p-value=0.014), but this association was weak (Cramer's V score= 0.148). The association between the gender of respondents and their mean KAP score was insignificant (p-value =0.422). In addition, the study found a moderate association between the occupation of the respondents and their mean KAP score (p-value=0.001; Cramer's V score=0.193). A good KAP score was associated with doctors, 57 (47.8%) of them scored high scores in this study. Other descriptive statistical associations are listed in Table 2.

Table 2

Associations between KAP scores and respondent characteristics.


Knowledge (p-value)* Attitude (p-value)* Practice Association(p-value)*
Age 0.00 0.01 0.21
Gender 0.85 0.47 0.86
Occupation 0.03 0.01 0.00
Vaccination Status 0.02 0.51 0.00
*(p-value is significant when less than 0.05)

3.5.1. Correlation between knowledge and practice

The study found that there is a strong association between the respondents' level of knowledge and their good practice towards HB (p-value< 0.001, Cramer's V score =0.381). In addition, the study showed that there is a significant association between the level of respondents' knowledge and their vaccination status (p-value=0.029), and this association was strong (Cramer's V score =0.306).

3.5.2. Correlation between the mean KAP score and the vaccination status

This study found out that there is a moderate association between the mean KAP score of the respondents and their vaccination status (p-value= 0.007; Cramer's V score =0.164; Figure 1), and this was the primary result of this study.

fig-1.jpg
Figure 1
Association between the average KAP score of the respondents and their vaccination status.

4. Discussion

The aim of the current study was to assess KAP scores towards HB among HCWs in public hospitals in Khartoum state. HCWs are crucial in controlling HB. The study found that there is a significant association between the age of participants and their mean KAP score (p-value=0.014), (Cramer's V score=0.148). This may be due to increased experience by age and being in contact with patients for a long time. The study found a moderate association between the occupation of the participants and their mean KAP score (p-value=0.001; Cramer's V score=0.193), where doctors were associated with the highest KAP scores (47.8% of doctors scored `good' in this study).

This study shows that 58.3% of the respondents scored a moderate level of knowledge towards HB.A similar study was held in Tikrit City- Iraq [14], in which a good level of knowledge was found amongst the medical staff. The deference between our study and Iraqi study may come from the different approaches in fighting the disease in both countries. Regarding the symptoms, only 9.9% of respondents showed a good level of knowledge; low knowledge about HB symptoms leads to a delay in the early diagnosis of the disease and may increase the rate of transmission of the disease among the population. In addition, the study found that 20% of respondents thought that contaminated food can transmit HBV, while10% didn't know if food can transmit HB or not. This finding reveals a huge misconception about HB and among HCWs.

This study showed that 46% of respondents said that HB patients should be quarantined, and this negative attitude may increase the stigma towards HB patients in society. Surprisingly, our study shows that 81.5% of respondents didn't know the guidelines that should be followed after a needle injury, and this is a dangerous indicator as these guidelines should be known by every HCW in order to decrease the chance of acquiring the disease.

Our study showed that the majority of respondents who do not wear gloves when they are dealing with patients were doctors (representing 12.6% out of the total number of doctors), which is similar to a study carried out in Wad Madani-Sudan [11]. That study showed that 10.4% of doctors did not wear gloves when they deal with patients, and this is a dangerous indicator of careless practice towards this disease.

This study revealed that 27.4% of respondents were not vaccinated against HB. However, compared to a previous study published in 2011 [11], there was a significant improvement in the vaccination status among HCWs; 26.19% in the previous study compared with 72.6% in the present study.

Moreover, this study revealed that doctors, in comparison with other occupations, have the highest KAP scores, and vaccinated respondents have a higher mean KAP score than non-vaccinated respondents. There was a moderate association between the mean KAP score of the respondents and their vaccination status (p-value=0.007; Cramer's V=0.164).

5. Conclusions

Although the study was performed in the capital city of Sudan, the research findings cannot be generalized to the whole population of HCWs in Sudan. Therefore, we recommend conducting more research in this area. Also, we had difficulties in finding a validated internationally standardized HB KAP questionnaire with a proper scoring system for HCWs, especially in the Arabic language.

We recommend that higher authorities continually assess the knowledge of HCWs about infectious organisms and HB, especially in developing countries. We believe that by increasing the level of knowledge of HCWs, it is possible to decrease the prevalence of HBV among the general population; therefore, we recommend that health education of HCWs should be increased by conducting workshops, symposiums and training about HB and post-exposure prophylaxis guidelines, and guidelines should be available at all health facilities. We also compel that the Ministry of Health and hospitals establish guidelines for accepting only vaccinated new HCWs and to organize vaccination campaigns for already employed, non-vaccinated HCWs.

6. Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Dr. Sarah Eltahir (MBBS, University of Khartoum) for her help in revising the manuscript.

7. Ethics Consideration

We obtained Ethical Clearance from the Khartoum state Ministry of Health Research Department.

8. Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Availability of Data and MaterialData are available upon request.

9. Author contributions

ASMM, ASMA, TAAA, MTHS, AMMH, MHMF, and AAAA contributed to the study design, data collection and analysis, and preparation of the manuscript. MASA contributed to interpretation of Data and revision of the manuscript. MNME contributed to preparation and revision of the manuscript and supervised the whole process. All authors were involved in the revision of the manuscript and have agreed to the final content.

References

1 

World Health Organization (WHO) , Hepatitis B [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Dec 1]

2 

Custer B., Sullivan S. D., Hazlet T. K., Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus, Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, Year: 2004, Volume: 38, Issue: 10, supplement 3, Page: S158-S168. DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200411003-00008

3 

Panlilio A. L., Cardo D. M., Grohskopf L. A., Heneine W., Ross C. S., Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis., MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control, Year: 2005, Volume: 54, Issue: -9, Page: 1-17.

4 

Alter H. J., Holland P. V., Purcell R. H., Lander J. J., Feinstone S. M., Morrow A. G., Schmidt P. J., Posttransfusion hepatitis after exclusion of commercial and hepatitis-B antigen-positive donors., Annals of Internal Medicine, Year: 1972, Volume: 77, Issue: 5, Page: 691-699. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-77-5-691

5 

Mudawi H. M., Epidemiology of viral hepatitis in Sudan, Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, Year: 2008, Volume: 1, Page: 9-13. DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s3887

6 

Lewis J. D., Enfield K. B., Sifri C. D., Hepatitis B in healthcare workers: Transmission events and guidance for management, World Journal of Hepatology, Year: 2015, Volume: 7, Issue: 3, Page: 488-497. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i3.488

7 

Pruss-Ustün A., Rapiti E., Hutin Y., Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Year: 2005, Volume: 48, Issue: 6, Page: 482-490. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20230

8 

McMahon B., Heyward W., Ritter D., Wainwright R., Rhoades E., Tower E., Lanier A., Helminiak C., A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAMME TO REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS INFECTION AND ITS SEQUELAE IN ALASKAN NATIVES, The Lancet, Year: 1987, Volume: 330, Issue: 8568, Page: 1134-1136. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)91557-1

9 

Bakry S. H., Mustafa A. F., Eldalo A. S., Yousif M. A., Knowledge, attitude and practice of health care workers toward Hepatitis B virus infection, Sudan, International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, Year: 2012, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Page: 95-102. DOI: 10.3233/jrs-2012-0558

10 

Ahmed Elmukashfi Elsheikh T., Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Heath Care Workers Regarding Transmission and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Infection, White Nile State, Sudan, 2013, American Journal of Health Research, Year: 2016, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Page: 18 DOI: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20160402.11

11 

Gadour M., Abdullah A., Knowledge of HBV Risks and Hepatitis B Vaccination Status Among Health Care Workers at Khartoum and Omdurman Teaching Hospitals of Khartoum State in Sudan, Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences, Year: 2011, Volume: 6, Issue: 2, DOI: 10.4314/sjms.v6i2.72451

12 

Statistics and Information Department of the Ministry of Health - Khartoum State, Annual Statistical Report for 2014

13 

Bhalerao S., Kadam P., Sample size calculation, International Journal for Ayurveda Research, Year: 2010, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Page: 55-57. DOI: 10.4103/0974-7788.59946

14 

Ul Haq N., Hassali M. A., Shafie A. A., Saleem F., Farooqui M., Aljadhey H., A cross sectional assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards Hepatitis B among healthy population of Quetta, Pakistan, BMC Public Health, Year: 2012, Volume: 12, Issue: 1, article no. 692, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-692

15 

Attaullah S., Khan S., Naseemullah , Ayaz S., Khan S. N., Ali I., Hoti N., Siraj S., Prevalence of HBV and HBV vaccination coverage in health care workers of tertiary hospitals of Peshawar, Pakistan, Virology Journal, Year: 2011, Volume: 8, article no. 275, DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-275

16 

Salomon J. A., Weinstein M. C., Hammitt J. K., Goldie S. J., Empirically calibrated model of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, American Journal of Epidemiology, Year: 2002, Volume: 156, Issue: 8, Page: 761-773. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwf100

17 

Doab A., Treloar C., Dore G. J., Knowledge and attitudes about treatment for hepatitis C virus infection and barriers to treatment among current injection drug users in Australia, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Year: 2005, Volume: 40, Issue: 5, Page: S313-S320. DOI: 10.1086/427446

18 

Hashim Mengal M., Cross Sectional Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Hepatitis C among Adolescents in Quetta, Pakistan, Journal of Dentistry, Year: 2014, Volume: 04, Issue: 10, DOI: 10.4172/2161-1122.1000263

19 

Chaudhari C. N., Bhagat M. R., Ashturkar A., Misra R. N., Hepatitis B immunisation in health care workers, Medical Journal Armed Forces India, Year: 2009, Volume: 65, Issue: 1, Page: 13-17. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80046-4

20 

Hwang E. W., Cheung R., Global Epidemiology of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Infection, American Chinese Journal of Medicine and Science, Year: 2011, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Page: 7 DOI: 10.7156/v4i1p007

FULL TEXT

Statistics

  • Downloads 3
  • Views 317

Article Tools

Navigation

Refbacks



ISSN: 1858-5051