Graduates Perception towards Instructional Methods of Emergency Medicine: Affecting Their Self-confidence in Emergency Departments
Background: Teaching emergencies has the ability to provide medical students with animportant knowledge and skills. In this study, we assessed the perception of Faculty of medicine, University of Gezira graduates regarding instructional methods of emergencies and their performance in emergency departments.
Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey, which was conducted among newly graduated doctors, during their internship rotation. We assessed the graduateperception about instructional methods of teaching EM during medical school and how they deal with emergencies. Likert’s scale of five points was used for assessment of the graduate response. This data was used for a correlation analysis.
Result: Ninety three graduates were enrolled. Male doctors’ numbers was 41(44%). Most of the graduated doctors agreed that clinical round and practical session in teaching emergency are useful among 80(86%) and 74(79.6%) of them respectively. Less number of graduated students 45 (48.4%) and 43 (36.6%) agreed that Problem-based learning and Seminar are useful in teaching emergency. Numbers of graduates who feel competence to assess and diagnose patients, request a relevant investigation, and can put a treatment plan and start the managements are 60(68.8%), 76(81.8%) and 61 (65.6%) respectively.
Conclusion: There are some strength and weakness in emergency teaching during medical school which affects their self-confidence when dealing with emergencies.
 C. J. Pitre, The unique educational value of emergency medicine student interest groups, The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22, no. 4, 427–428, (2002).
 W. P. Burdick, N. J. Jouriles, G. D’Onofrio, L. E. Kass, J. F. Mahoney, and K. M. Restifo, Emergency medicine in undergraduate education, Academic Emergency Medicine, 5,no. 11, 1105–1110, (1998).
 M. D. Gismalla and A. A. Alawad, Undergraduate Emergency Medicine Education: Problems and Challenges, Austin Emerg Med, 3, no. 1, p. 1049, (2017).
 I. M. Saiboon, M. J. Jaafar, N. S. Ahmad, Z. Ahmad, F. A. Hamzah, and S. M. Jamal, Simulation based education in delivering emergency medicine module, 388–393
 WS. Thayer, Osler the teacher. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp, in Osler the teacher. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1919, 30, 198–200, 1230-1233, 303, 1919.
 R. H. Steadman, W. C. Coates, M. H. Yue, R. Matevosian, B. R. Larmon, L. McCullough, and D. Ariel, Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills, Critical Care Medicine, 34, no. 1, 151–157, (2006).
 A. Ziv, P. Root Wolpe, S. D. Small, and S. Glick, Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative, Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 78, no. 8, 783–788, (2003).
 D. C. Kern, T. A. Parrino, and D. R. Korst, The Lasting Value of Clinical Skills, Journal of the American Medical Association, 254, no. 1, 70–76, (1985)
 G. Bandiera, S. Lee, and R. Tiberius, Creating effective learning in today’s emergency departments: How accomplished teachers get it done, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 45, no. 3, 253–261, (2005).
 C. Heidenreich, P. Lye, D. Simpson, and M. Lourich, The search for effective and efficient ambulatory teaching methods through the literature, Pediatrics, 105, no. 1, 231–237, (2000).
 B. G. Charlton, Lectures are such an effective teaching method because they exploit evolved human psychology to improve learning, Medical Hypotheses, 67, no. 6, 1261–1265, (2006).
 B. Graffam, Active learning in medical education: Strategies for beginning implementation, Medical Teacher, 29, no. 1, 38–42, (2007).
 B. G. Charlton, Science school and culture school: Improving the efficiency of high school science teaching in a system of mass science education, Medical Hypotheses, 67, no. 1, 1–5, (2006).
 ZA. Sebai, Medical education: which way forward? J Family Community Med, 8, no.3, 17–18, (2001).
 Smith B Edward H, Lecturing: Case studies, experience and practice. London: Kogan;2001.