Socio-cultural Transformations in Traditional Societies in the Context of Globalization
Abstract
The paper presents a study of socio-cultural transformations in traditional societies in the context of globalization. The authors emphasize that global changes have affected all aspects of traditional societies using the socio-cultural approach. Postmodern culture, the problems of self-identification at different levels of the human community are the main consequences of globalization. The differences between the social strata are leveled through the introduction of a mass unified consumerism culture, desubjectivation of the individual and public institutions takes place. The social space has changed, the forms of human interaction with the external environment and interpersonal communications have changed. Previously existing models of communications, which were direct interpersonal relations, were replaced in the modern world by forms of mediated communication. They bring new patterns of behavior and understanding of sociocultural reality. Changing the traditional family as an important subject of socialization and translation of spiritual values leads to further transformations in society.
Keywords: sociocultural transformations; values; globalization; society; traditions.
References
[1] Abdulaeva, E.S., Udzhukhova, B.A. (2018), The impact of globalization on traditional spiritual culture. Bulletin of the ASU. Issue 1 (214), 83.
[2] Baydarov, A. W. (2012), The impact of globalization on human culture and values, [Online], [Retrieved March 10, 2018]: http://www.inspp.ru/index.php?option= com_content&task=view&id=100&Itemid=11.
[3] Weber, A. (1998), Ideas to the problems of sociology of state and culture, Selected: Crisis of European culture. University book, St. Petersburg.
[4] Gavrov, S. N. (2010), Modernization in the name of Empire. Socio-cultural aspects of modernizationprocesses in Russia, Editorial URSS, Moscow.
[5] Gadaev, V. Yu. (2014), Individual personality is the beginning in the context of spiritual safety of a person. Theory and practice of social development, 6, 24.
[6] Gadzhiev, K. S. (2011), National identity: conceptual aspect. Issues of philosophy, [Online], [Retrieved May 22, 2018]: http:/vphil.ru/index.php?option= com_content&task=view&id=400&Itemid=52.
[7] Simmel, G. (1996), The conflict of modern culture favorites, Volume 2, Contemplation of life, Lawyer, Moscow.
[8] Kara-Murza, S. G. (2004), Mind manipulation. Textbook. Algorithm, Moscow.
[9] Cassidy, F. (2002), Globalization and cultural identity. [Online], [Retrieved February 17, 2018]: http:/old.russ.ru/politics/20021223-kes.html.
[10] Kroeber, A. (1997), Anthology of cultural studies. Culturology of the twentieth century series, vol.1, University book, St. Petersburg.
[11] Lyausheva, S. A. and Jade, Z. A. (2016), New trends in the study of network identity, [Online], [Retrieved May 22, 2018]: http:/vphil.ru/index.php?option= com_content&task=view&id=400&Itemid=52.
[12] Rybin, V.A. (2009), The Components of the Anthropological Crisis of Modernity. The Human Being in Contemporary Philosophical Conceptions, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[13] Timoshchuk, A. S. (2007), Traditional culture: essence and existence. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree. N. Novgorod.
[14] Yusupov, M. M. (2007), Legal culture in the transforming society, Legal Culture in the Transforming Society.
[15] Toffler, E. (2002), Future shock, AST publishing house, Moscow.