Collaborative Public Space in China: Two Waterfront Projects, Shanghai and Suzhou
Abstract
This paper discusses public space in China and explores how theories of public space can be applied to two waterfront projects. As case studies the paper compares two public waterfront projects: The 18 km Jinji Lake project in Suzhou and the 45km Huangpu River waterfront project in Shanghai, both completed in 2018. The Jinji lake development in the heart of Suzhou designed by EDAW later AECOM also boasts inclusive 24/7 access and people centered design. Democratic theory is commonly used in the West to discuss public space however LiminHeearguesthatthediscourseasunderstoodinthewesterndemocratictradition is not adequate for Asian cities (Hee, 2017). Constructing Singapore Public Space, Springer) This paper finds that although the idea of public space in China is argued to be an evolving concpt (Gaubatz, 2008, pp 72-83), notions of democratic participation, Human Centered Design (HCD) and place-making methods are central development policyinChinesecities.Whereastermslikevibrancyandvitalityarecommonlyusedby scholars to evaluate and discuss public space in China, rather than democratic theory, theories from western scholars such as Habermas’s theory of the public sphere are also relevant and collaborative practices between civil society and the state are key to the participatory nature of Chinese public space.
References
[1] Bideau, F G. (2008) ‘L’instrumentalisation de la culture populaire. Le cas de la danse du yangge en Chine’, Tsantsa n.13, Rapports de pouvoir, pp 52-60.
[2] Brown, K. (2014), ’China and Habermas’s Public Sphere’. Available from: https://www.opendemocracy. net/en/author/kerry-brown/ (Accessed: 4 May 2019)
[3] Carroll, P J. (2006) Between Heaven and Modernity: Reconstructing Suzhou, 1895-1937, Stanford University Press.
[4] Carmona,M,DeMagalhaes,C.,andHammond,L.(2008).PublicSpace:TheManage-mentDimension. London: Routledge.
[5] Carmona, M. (2015) ‘Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative’, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Vol. 8, no. 4.
[6] Gaubatz P. (1995) “Urban Transformation in Post-Mao China, Impacts of the Reform Era on China’s urban form’, in D. Davis, R. Kraus, B. Naughton, and E. Perry, eds. Urban Spaces in Contemporary China, The Potential for Autonomy and Community in Post-Mao China,WoodrowWilsonCenterPress Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 28-60
[7] Gaubatz, P. (2008) ‘New Public Space in Urban China: Fewer Walls, More Malls in Beijing, Shanghai and Xining’, China Perspectives, n.4, pp. 72-83
[8] Gu, Edward X. (1999) “Cultural Intellectuals and the Politics of the Cultural Public Space in Communist China (1979-1989): A Case Study of Three Intellectual Groups.” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 389–431.
[9] Habermas J. (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991. p. 175-177
[10] Hassenpflug D. (2004) ‘The Rise of Public Urban Space in China’, paper presented at the City Futures Conference, Chicago, IL, 8-10 July
[11] Hee L. (2017) Constructing Singapore Public Space, Springer.
[12] Lefebvre H. (1991). The production of space, Oxford: Blackwell
[13] Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox, London, New York: Verso.
[14] Orum A. et al. (2009) ‘Public Man and Public Space in Shanghai Today’, City and Community Journal
[15] Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16] Xie J. and Heath T. (2017) ‘Conservation and revitalization of historic streets in China: Pingjiang Street, Suzhou’, Journal of Urban Design, vol.22, no.4, pp 455-476.