Voices of Dissent: The Polemics of Islamic Thought in Gorontalo

Abstract

This study explores the polemic of Islamic thought in Gorontalo, focusing on the voices of dissent and the dynamics that arise from differing perspectives in society. The aim is to understand how these differences influence religious practices and reflect broader debates on contemporary issues within a local context. Using an ethnographic approach, the research draws on participant observation and in-depth interviews with clerics and leaders from key Islamic organizations such as Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyah, Jama’ah Tabligh, and Wahdah Islamiyah. Observations were conducted in mosques, community centers, and religious gatherings. The results show that differences of opinion in Islamic thought in Gorontalo extend beyond traditional fiqh debates, encompassing deeper ideological issues, including differing views on state ideology and religious authority. While the diversity of thought generates some tension, it also fosters opportunities for dialogue and critical reflection. Many community members value this plurality and seek to preserve social harmony despite theological differences. However, there are also concerns about the influence of extremism that can threaten social stability. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how Islamic thought evolves in regional contexts and highlights the role of constructive dialogue in navigating religious diversity.